Frequently Asked Questions
How have reading curriculums changed in the NYC DOE ?
In response to low reading proficiency levels citywide, Mayor Eric Adams and Schools Chancellor David Banks have launched the NYCReads initiative. This program mandates significant curriculum changes in K-5 schools. Some districts are also beginning to make significant changes to middle school curriculums.
All NYC K-5 schools are now mandated to use one of three NYC DOE-chosen reading curriculums. Each district superintendent chose one of three curricula; EL, HMH Into Reading, or Wit and Wisdom. Half of NYC K-5 schools were designated Phase One, and required to implement a new curriculum starting in September 2023. The rest of NYC K-5 schools were in Phase Two, and began to implement their district’s chosen new curriculum in September 2024.
This is a frequently asked question?
It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.
What is the science of reading? (SOR)
In its academic meaning, “science of reading” refers to a body of research on how best to teach kids to read. It includes specific word reading instruction, phonics, and phonemic awareness in the primary grades, and a focus on vocabulary, comprehension, and fostering engagement across all grades.
SOR suggests the best ways to teach reading, but it is not a curriculum. It does not specify content or books to be used. SOR does recommend that any approach to literacy be student-centered, culturally responsive, inclusive, and rigorous.
For a brief and clear explanation of what SOR is, and what it is NOT, please see here for NYSED Science of Reading Brief #1 and Brief #2.
What research supports the use of these curricula?
DOE officials have repeatedly claimed that they chose three “high quality, evidence-backed curricu[la].”
The claim that these curricula are “high quality” is based on their green rating by EdReports. EdReports green ratings have been shown to be problematic and not a reliable indicator of quality (Wexler, 2024).
Regarding the claim that HMH is “evidence-backed,” there are no peer-reviewed, rigorous academic studies to support the claim that
The only study done was a commissioned report on grades 3 and 5 in a small suburban district with significantly different demographics than NYC. The study lasted only a few months and was terminated mid-way due to COVID. Rigorous academic studies that seek to prove the effectiveness of any intervention need a control group, peer review, and large sample sizes; this study did not meet any of that criteria.